01
Visibility & Policy
AI system inventory, model registry with version traceability, risk-based deployment approval, EU AI Act jurisdiction-based access restrictions.
Home | Consulting | Strategy | GOVERNANCE ADVISORY
Enforceable AI control boundaries, reduced model and regulatory risk, and scalable, compliant AI adoption — mapped to MITRE ATLAS, OWASP's LLM Top 10, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. Distinct from PHTN.ai's platform-level runtime controls.

01
AI system inventory, model registry with version traceability, risk-based deployment approval, EU AI Act jurisdiction-based access restrictions.
02
Prompt ingress inspection for PII/PHI/IP, response egress scanning, vector database access segmentation, embedding encryption at rest.
03
Dataset integrity verification, signed model artifacts, SBOM/MBOM dependency analysis, secured ML CI/CD workflows.
04
Token-level behavioral anomaly scoring, prompt injection signature detection, session isolation, automatic policy tightening.
05
Structured AI red teaming, adversarial robustness testing, bias and fairness threshold checks, version rollback.
06
Observability, audit trails, shadow-AI detection, executive compliance reporting.
Full control over data, models, and runtime. Full control stack: posture management, data-loss prevention, AI gateway, MCP gateway, runtime protection, red team, observability.
ChatGPT and third-party tools — limited control. Focus shifts to policy, approved-tool lists, and data protection: shadow-AI detection and block/redact enforcement.
Photon's AI governance practice is built against external, named standards — not a proprietary checklist.
Layer-based framework for agentic AI threat modeling
LLM Top 10 — the industry-standard LLM risk taxonomy
Risk Management Framework — Govern, Map, Measure, Manage
Jurisdiction-based access restrictions built into policy enforcement

Browser Extension Pilot
Real-time data-loss prevention monitoring across public AI tool usage, rolled out as a production pilot.
MCP Gateway Integration
Agent permissions, data-in-motion blocking, instruction monitoring, response filtering, scope enforcement, and full lifecycle logging.


Scaling AI adoption without a unified security framework created data-exposure and compliance-gap risk. A standardized AI security architecture review and control-domain rollout brought governance and oversight into one framework.